肺癌认知测量问卷的汉化及信效度检验

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9143.2024.02.006

天津护理 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 150-153.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9143.2024.02.006

肺癌认知测量问卷的汉化及信效度检验

武佳馨 ¹ 姜男 ²

（1.天津市眼科医院，天津 300020；2.天津医科大学护理学院）

出版日期:2024-04-28 发布日期:2024-04-29
基金资助:
天津市教委科研计划项目（2019SK132）

Sinicization and reliability and validity testing of lung cancer awareness measure

WU Jiaxin¹ , JIANG Nan²

(1. Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin 300020; 2. School of Nursing, Tianjin Medical University)

Online:2024-04-28 Published:2024-04-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：对肺癌认知测量问卷（lung cancer awareness measure，Lung-CAM）进行汉化，并检验其信效度。方法：对英文版 Lung-CAM 进行翻译、回译和跨文化调试及预调查，形成中文版肺癌认知测量问卷。采用中文版肺癌认知测量问卷对 143 名普通人进行调查。结果：中文版 Lung-CAM 共有 18 个条目，经探索性因子分析，提取 3 个公因子，累计方差贡献率为 47.78%，条目水平的内容效度指数为 0.87~1.00，量表水平的内容效度指数为 0.960。整个问卷的 Cronbach′s α 系数为 0.806，警告信号的知识维度、风险因素维度及早期识别维度 Guttman 折半系数分别为 0.856、0.734、0.732。结论：中文版肺癌认知测量问卷具有良好的信效度，可以作为国内普通人群对肺癌认知情况调查的测评工具。

关键词: 肺癌, 认知情况, 信度, 效度, 汉化

Abstract: Objective: To translate lung cancer awareness measure (Lung-CAM) into Chinese，and test its reliability and validity. Methods: The English version of Lung-CAM was translated, back-translated, cross-cultural debugging and pre-investigation to form the Chinese version of lung cancer awareness measure. The Chinese version of lung cancer awareness measure was used to investigate 143 cases of general population. Results: The Chinese Lung-CAM has 18 items. Three common factors were extracted through exploratory factor analysis. The cumulative variance contribution was 47.78 percent. Content validity index of items was 0.87~1.00 and the content validity index of the scale level was 0.960. Cronbach′s α coefficient of the total scale was 0.806. The Guttman half-fold coefficient of the warning signal knowledge dimension, risk factor dimension and early identification dimension were 0.856, 0.734 and 0.732, respectively. Conclusion: The Chinese version of lung cancer awareness measure has good reliability and validity, and can be used as a tool for screening lung cancer cognition in Chinese general population.

Key words: Lung cancer, Awareness, Reliability, Validity, Sinicization

武佳馨姜男 . 肺癌认知测量问卷的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 天津护理, 2024, 32(2): 150-153.

WU Jiaxin , JIANG Nan. Sinicization and reliability and validity testing of lung cancer awareness measure[J]. Tianjin Journal of Nursing, 2024, 32(2): 150-153.

[1]	岳晨琪吕虹蕾王艳梅曹灿灿路明惠柴倩文魏力 . 下肢静脉曲张射频消融术后患者出院准备度量表的构建及信效度检验[J]. 天津护理, 2024, 32(3): 253-258.
[2]	董方刘梦元尹红于雁 . 肺癌患者术后疲劳影响因素及干预对策的研究现状[J]. 天津护理, 2024, 32(3): 372-376.
[3]	路露李春阳芦鸿雁雷新宁郭永合. 老年肺癌患者预后营养指数与术后康复的相关性研究[J]. 天津护理, 2024, 32(2): 184-188.
[4]	李紫梦刘璟莹杨丽君李琪孙垚马宏文 . 老年慢性病患者健康管理需求量表的构建及信效度研究[J]. 天津护理, 2024, 32(1): 1-6.
[5]	牟华付艳枝席祖洋. 肺癌患者阿片类药物服用依从性障碍因素的质性研究[J]. 天津护理, 2024, 32(1): 6-10.
[6]	马宁滕艳华阎玲候莹鸽阚中帆. PD-1/PDL-1 治疗的肺癌患者衰弱现状及影响因素分析[J]. 天津护理, 2023, 31(5): 524-528.
[7]	徐鋆卉冯琳赵俊刘红波. 非小细胞肺癌患者靶向治疗服药依从性及影响因素分析[J]. 天津护理, 2023, 31(4): 395-399.
[8]	罗倩吴丽珊蔡丹莉李金钟明利蒋春霞. 贵州省黔北地区肺癌术后患者总体幸福感现状及影响因素分析[J]. 天津护理, 2023, 31(4): 415-418.
[9]	王苹苹张理想孙迪周晓娟. 起搏器植入术后患者康复训练依从性量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 天津护理, 2023, 31(1): 15-18.
[10]	李梅石怡. 1 例复发肺癌患者服用大剂量靶向药物后不良反应的护理[J]. 天津护理, 2023, 31(1): 121-124.
[11]	杨雅静马宁滕艳华. 72例胸腔镜肺癌切除术患者术后并发气道高反应性咳嗽的护理[J]. 天津护理, 2022, 30(6): 701-704.
[12]	汪燃黄菲. 肺癌患者希望水平影响因素及干预措施的研究进展[J]. 天津护理, 2022, 30(6): 730-733.
[13]	宋辉王悦. 手术患者压力性损伤风险评估工具的多中心测评研究[J]. 天津护理, 2022, 30(5): 539-543.
[14]	徐鋆卉冯琳马玥陈新. 老年肺癌患者首次化疗后出院准备度现状及影响因素分析[J]. 天津护理, 2022, 30(2): 131-135.
[15]	吕丹陈韵芳尹承芬田丽. 机械通气患者拔管后吞咽障碍筛查工具的汉化及信效度评价[J]. 天津护理, 2022, 30(2): 161-165.

肺癌认知测量问卷的汉化及信效度检验

Sinicization and reliability and validity testing of lung cancer awareness measure

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics