天津护理 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 25-32.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9143.2026.01.005

• 老年护理专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

老年急性冠脉综合征PCI术后患者衰弱的潜在剖面及影响因素分析

王爽羽 沈梦双 张芝艳 赵雪杰 林梅   

  1. (天津医科大学总医院,天津 300052)
  • 出版日期:2026-02-28 发布日期:2026-02-25

Latent profile analysis of frailty and its influencing factors in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention

WANG Shuangyu, SHEN Mengshuang, ZHAO Zhiyan, ZHAO Xuejie, LIN Mei   

  1. (Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052)
  • Online:2026-02-28 Published:2026-02-25

摘要: 目的:探讨老年急性冠脉综合征PCI术后患者衰弱现状及其潜在分型,并分析不同分型的影响因素。方法:采用便利抽样法,选取2024年4月至10月在天津市某三级甲等医院心脏内科住院的老年急性冠脉综合征PCI术后患者作为研究对象。使用一般资料调查表、Tilburg衰弱评估量表、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表、患者健康问卷、广泛焦虑障碍量表、领悟社会支持量表、国际体力活动量问卷(短)、营养风险筛查2002进行调查。使用潜在剖面分析探索衰弱的潜在分型,采用单因素分析和Logistic回归分析探究相关影响因素。结果:共发放问卷330份,回收有效问卷325份。325例老年急性冠脉综合征PCI术后患者衰弱发生率为42.77%,可分为“综合型-低衰弱组”(57.23%)、“心理社会型-中衰弱组”(25.85%)、“躯体型-高衰弱组”(16.92%)3个分型。抑郁水平高、睡眠质量差、有营养风险的患者归属于“躯体型-高衰弱组”的概率较大,焦虑水平高、社会支持水平低下及低体力活动的患者归属于“心理社会型-中衰弱组”的概率较大,握力大、慢性合并症数量少的患者归属于“综合型-低衰弱组”的概率较大(P<0.05)。结论:老年急性冠脉综合征PCI术后患者衰弱发生率处于较高水平,且存在明显异质性,医护人员应关注老年急性冠脉综合征PCI术后患者衰弱状况,重点关注“心理社会型-中衰弱组”“躯体型-高衰弱组”的患者,及时针对其衰弱特征和影响因素开展精准化干预,以预防或延缓衰弱的发生发展。

关键词: 衰弱, 老年, 急性冠脉综合征, 潜在剖面, 影响因素

Abstract: Objective: This study examines the prevalence and latent profiles of frailty among elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome following percutaneous coronary intervention, and analyzes influencing factors across different frailty subtypes. Methods: Using a convenience sampling method, elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and were hospitalized in the cardiology department of a tertiary grade A hospital in Tianjin from April to October 2024 were selected as study subjects. Data were collected using the General Information Questionnaire, Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS), International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF), and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002). Latent profile analysis was employed to explore potential subtypes of frailty, while univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis were conducted to identify associated influencing factors. Results: A total of 330 questionnaires were distributed, with 325 valid responses collected. The prevalence of frailty among the 325 elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention was 42.77%. Using latent profile analysis, three frailty subtypes were identified: the "Comprehensive Low Frailty Group" (57.23%), the "Psychosocial-Moderate Frailty Group" (25.85%), and the "Physical-High Frailty Group" (16.92%). Logistic regression analysis indicated that patients with higher levels of depression, poorer sleep quality, and nutritional risk were more likely to belong to the "Physical-High Frailty Group." Patients with higher anxiety levels, lower social support, and lower physical activity were more likely to be classified into the "Psychosocial-Moderate Frailty Group." Greater handgrip strength and fewer chronic comorbidities were associated with a higher probability of belonging to the "Comprehensive-Low Frailty Group" (all P<0.05). Conclusion: Frailty is highly prevalent and demonstrates substantial heterogeneity among elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention. Healthcare professionals should integrate frailty assessment into routine care for this population, with focused attention on the “Psychosocial-Moderate Frailty Group” and “Physical-High Frailty Group”. Implementing timely, individualized interventions that target subtype-specific features and modifiable risk factors is essential to prevent or mitigate frailty progression in these patients.

Key words: Weak, Elderly, Acute coronary syndrome, Potential profile, Influencing factor