天津护理

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

静脉通路护理门诊护士对PICC护理认知及需求现状调查

 

汪洋   张华甫   沈傲梅   郑瑞双
  

  1.  
    (天津医科大学肿瘤医院 国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心 天津市肿瘤防治重点实验室 天津市恶性肿瘤临床医学研究中心,天津 300060)
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-04 修回日期:2019-02-13 出版日期:2019-08-28 发布日期:2019-08-26
  • 基金资助:
     
    天津市护理学会面上科研课题项目(tjhlky20180104)

 
Study on cognition status and demand for PICC care in clinic nurses of venous access care

 

WANG Yang, ZHANG Huafu, SHEN Aomei, ZHENG Ruishuang
  

  1.  
    (Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060)
  • Received:2018-10-04 Revised:2019-02-13 Online:2019-08-28 Published:2019-08-26

摘要:  

目的:了解静脉通路护理门诊护士对PICC护理认知及需求的现状。方法:采用便利抽样法选取天津市25所医院114名静脉通路护理门诊护士运用自行编制的PICC护理认知问卷进行问卷调查,并对调查结果进行分析。结果:本次调查的113名静脉专科护士对门诊管理标准认知中得分最高的是管理制度(满分率为67.26%)、最低的为人员配置情况(满分率为23.90%);PICC护理自我能力评价部分均值最高的是有效沟通能力(3.50±0.520)分、最低的是科研能力(2.36±0.846)分;PICC维护操作认知情况方面,仅56.7%的护士认为集束化护理套餐执行情况非常好;单因素分析结果显示有无护士长管理、是否接受PICC培训、不同文化程度的护士得分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);相关分析显示护士的得分与年龄、工作年限、从事PICC工作年限呈正相关(P<0.05)。多元线性回归分析显示文化程度、年龄影响护士认知情况。结论:静脉通路护理门诊在健康教育内涵、人才培养体系、配套设施方面需进一步完善,从而保证静脉治疗护理安全。

关键词:  ,

Abstract:  

Objective: To investigate the cognition status and needs for PICC care in clinic nurses of care of venous access (CVA). Methods: A convenience sampling was employed to select 114 nurses working in CVA clinic of 25 hospitals in Tianjin; a self-made questionnaire was created to investigate the participants’ cognition on PICC care. The questionnaires were provided on the spot and taken back right after they were finished. The data collected from the participants were calculated. Results: The survey results showed that the highest level of recognition was rules and regulations in the management system (67.26%), the lowest was staffing requirement (23.90%); in the self-evaluation of PICC nursing ability, effective communication ability (3.50±0.520) was the highest, scientific research ability(2.36±0.846) was the lowest; only 56.7% of the patients thought that the implementation of the cluster bundle for PICC was very good. The results of univariate analysis showed that there were statistically significant difference in whether management by head nurse or not, PICC training or not, educational level (P<0.05). The correlation factor analysis showed that the cognitive level of nurses was positively correlated with age, working years and PICC working years. Conclusion: We should to improve in the aspects of health education for patient, training system of nurse, and a complete set of device and instrument, in order to ensure the safety of intravenous treatment.

Key words:  Venous access, Nursing clinic, Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC), Nurse, Cognize