天津护理 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 663-667.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9143.2024.06.008

• 调查与分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

永久性心脏起搏器植入术后患者个人生活掌控感现状及影响因素分析

李婷婷 张理想 周晓娟   

  1. (中国科学技术大学附属第一医院,安徽 合肥 230036)
  • 出版日期:2024-12-28 发布日期:2024-12-16

Analysis of the current situation and influencing factors of personal mastery among patients after permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation

LI Tingting, ZHANG Lixiang, ZHOU Xiaojuan   

  1. (The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei Anhui 230036)
  • Online:2024-12-28 Published:2024-12-16

摘要: 目的:调查永久性心脏起搏器植入术后患者个人生活掌控感现状并分析其影响因素,为制订患者康复方案提供参考。方法:采用一般资料调查表、心理弹性量表(Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale,CD-RISC)、一般自我效能感量表(General Self-efficacy Scale,GSES)、个人生活掌控感量表对 195 例永久性心脏起搏器植入术后患者进行问卷调查。结果:永久性心脏起搏器植入术后患者个人生活掌控感得分为(21.95±5.20)分,CD-RISC 得分为(61.63±11.08)分,GSES 得分为(25.39±5.61)分。依据个人生活掌控感总分情况将研究对象分为掌控感良好组(n=51)和掌控感差组(n=144)。两组患者的年龄、家庭人均月收入水平、文化程 度、病程、合并症个数、GSES 总分和 CD-RISC 总分比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Logistic 回归结果显示,病程为永久性心脏 起搏器植入术后患者个人生活掌控感的危险因素(P<0.05),文化程度、家庭人均月收入、GSES 总分和 CD-RISC 总分是永久性心 脏起搏器植入术后患者个人生活掌控感的保护因素P<0.05)。结论:永久性心脏起搏器植入术后患者个人生活掌控感水平较差。医护人员需要特别关注经济收入低、教育程度低、病程较长的患者,为其提供个性化的健康指导,以增强患者的自我效能感,改善患者的心理弹性水平,帮助患者提高对生活的掌控感。

关键词: 永久性心脏起搏器, 个人生活掌控感, 影响因素

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the current status of patients′ personal mastery after permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation and analyze its influencing factors, providing reference of rehabilitation programs for patients. Methods: The questionnaire survey was conducted among 195 patients after permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation by using the General Information Questionnaire, the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), and the Personal Mastery Scale(PMS). Results: The mean score of PMS, CD-RISC, and GSES were 21.95±5.20, 61.63±11.08, and 25.39±5.61, respectively. The participants were categorized into the better personal mastery group (n=51) and poorer personal mastery group (n=144) based on the total score of personal mastery scale. There was statistically significant difference when comparing the age, monthly household income per capita, education level, course of the disease, number of comorbidities, the score of GSES and the score of CD-RISC between the two groups (P<0.05). The Logistic regression showed that the course of disease was a risk factor of patients′ personal mastery after permament cardiac pacemaker implantation (P<0.05), while education level, monthly household income per capita, the score of GSES and the score of CD-RISC were protective factors for patients′ personal mastery after permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation(P<0.05). Conclusion: The level of patients′ personal mastery after permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation is poor. This study indicated that healthcare professionals need to pay special attention to patients with low economic income, low education, and prolonged medical conditions, and provide them with personalized health guidance in order to improve their level of psychological resilience, self-efficacy, and personal mastery.

Key words: Permanent cardiac pacemaker, Personal mastery, Influencing factors

中图分类号: