3种衰弱评估工具对老年腹部手术患者术后并发症预测效能的比较分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9143.2022.04.007

天津护理 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 408-411.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9143.2022.04.007

3种衰弱评估工具对老年腹部手术患者术后并发症预测效能的比较分析

韩旭亚¹ 姜虹² 张锦锦² 吕丹² 尹岩岩³ 田丽²

（1.天津医科大学肿瘤医院国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心天津市“肿瘤防治”重点实验室天津市恶性肿瘤临床医学研究中心，天津 300060；2.天津市第三中心医院；3.天津医科大学总医院）

出版日期:2022-08-28 发布日期:2022-09-01

Comparison of the efficacy of three frailty assessment tools on predicting postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing abdominal surgery

HAN Xuya¹， JIANG Hong²，ZHANG Jinjin²，LYV Dan²，YIN Yanyan³，TIAN Li²

（1.Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital，Tianjin 300060；2. Tianjin Third Central Hospital；3.Tianjin Medical University General Hospital）

Online:2022-08-28 Published:2022-09-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：比较衰弱表型（Frailty Phenotype，FP)、衰弱量表（Frail scale，FS）、埃德蒙特衰弱量表（The Edmonton Frail Scale，EFS）3种衰弱评估工具对老年腹部手术患者术后并发症的预测效能，以期为衰弱评估工具的选择提供参考。方法：便利选取某三级甲等医院年龄≥60岁的老年腹部手术患者184例，采用FP、FS、EFS评估患者的衰弱状态，收集患者的一般资料、手术类型、手术方式以及术后并发症的资料。应用?字2检验，通过受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic，ROC) 曲线分析FP、FS和EFS对老年腹部手术患者术后并发症的预测作用。结果：184例老年腹部手术患者FP、FS、EFS衰弱的检出率分别为22.3%、16.8%、22.2%， 3种评估工具的衰弱检出率比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。FP预测老年腹部手术患者术后并发症发生的ROC面积为0.798，高于FS、EFS的0.681和0.670（P＜0.05）。结论：3种衰弱评估工具对老年腹部手术患者的衰弱检出率具有一致性。与FS、EFS相比较，FP更能够有效预测老年腹部手术患者术后并发症的发生。

关键词: 衰弱, 老年人, 手术后并发症, 预测效能, 评估工具

Abstract: Objective：To compare the efficacy of Frailty Phenotype(FP), Frail Scale(FS) and The Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) on predicting the postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing abdominal surgery, so as to provide reference for the selection of frailty assessment tools. Methods: A total of 184 elderly patients undergoing abdominal surgery aged ≥60 years old in a tertiary Class A hospital were included by convenience sampling method. The premorbid frailty status was assessed by FP, FS and EFS. The general information, the type of operation, the operation method and the postoperative complications were collected. Chi-square test was applied and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to evaluate the predictive efficacy of FP, FS and EFS. Results: The frailty detection rates of FP、FS and EFS in 184 elderly patients undergoing abdominal surgery were 22.3%,16.8%and 22.2%,resectively. There was no significant difference in the frailty detection rates of the three assessment tools（P＞0.05）. The area under the curve (AUC) in prediction of postoperative complications in elderly patients with abdominal elective surgery using FP was 0.798, which was significantly higher than that of FS(0.681) and EFS(0.670)（P＜0.05）. Conclusion: The frailty of elderly patients undergoing abdominal surgery were consistent with the three frailty assessment tools. Compared with FS and EFS, FP has higher efficacy on predicting the occurrence of postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

Key words: Frailty, Elderly, Postoperative complications, Prediction, Assessment tools

韩旭亚姜虹张锦锦吕丹尹岩岩田丽. 3种衰弱评估工具对老年腹部手术患者术后并发症预测效能的比较分析[J]. 天津护理, 2022, 30(4): 408-411.

HAN Xuya, JIANG Hong, ZHANG Jinjin, LYV Dan, YIN Yanyan, TIAN Li. Comparison of the efficacy of three frailty assessment tools on predicting postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing abdominal surgery[J]. Tianjin Journal of Nursing, 2022, 30(4): 408-411.

[1]	赵文婷张雪梅杨茗 . 住院老年患者吞咽障碍现状及影响因素研究[J]. 天津护理, 2022, 30(3): 258-262.
[2]	隆政达陈丽君. 护士工作生活质量现状及影响因素的研究进展[J]. 天津护理, 2022, 30(2): 240-244.
[3]	李杰虎银凤茹亚楠赵杰刚. 化疗导致周围神经病变评估工具的研究进展[J]. 天津护理, 2022, 30(2): 245-249.
[4]	张圆圆杨欣欣郭琳琳李妍. 中国老年人休闲活动调查问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 天津护理, 2022, 30(1): 18-22.
[5]	张燕汪星星梁慧敏. “互联网+”背景下天津市老年门诊患者就医体验现状分析[J]. 天津护理, 2021, 29(6): 641-645.
[6]	于虹于兰张羽胡洁. 石家庄市社区多重用药老年人用药知识和用药行为的现状研究[J]. 天津护理, 2021, 29(5): 518-523.
[7]	高霞. 老年急性冠脉综合征PCI术后患者衰弱现状及影响因素研究[J]. 天津护理, 2020, 28(4): 379-383.
[8]	张靓曹健敏. 社区老年Ⅱ型糖尿病病人服药依从性影响因素分析[J]. 天津护理, 2020, 28(4): 470-472.
[9]	宋辉王悦刘春英王莉李宏彬赵子鹏郑晨. 护理人员对术中压力性损伤风险评估现状及临床需求的研究[J]. 天津护理, 2020, 28(3): 253-257.
[10]	程正楠邢秋玲许洪梅包頔穆纯. 老年糖尿病患者衰弱现况及影响因素分析[J]. 天津护理, 2020, 28(3): 293-298.
[11]	崔静史宝欣张秀英 . 老年口腔白斑患者死亡态度与生活质量的相关性研究[J]. 天津护理, 2019, 27(6): 671-674.
[12]	王莹马颖丽张楠孙超. 住院肝硬化患者衰弱现状及影响因素研究[J]. 天津护理, 2019, 27(5): 542-546.
[13]	曹虹晁爱军李冠楠毕辰琰赵立娟赵岳. 骨健康关爱项目对老年骨质疏松患者治疗依从性的影响[J]. 天津护理, 2019, 27(5): 565-568.
[14]	潘春芳窦英茹朱庆捷郭凌翔常淑文单雪芹宋静. 多学科协作早期运动预防ICU机械通气患者获得性衰弱的临床观察[J]. 天津护理, 2019, 27(4): 417-419.
[15]	邓月枫夏明瑛. 老年人自我护理能力与社区护理服务需求相关性研究[J]. 天津护理, 2019, 27(2): 162-165.

3种衰弱评估工具对老年腹部手术患者术后并发症预测效能的比较分析

Comparison of the efficacy of three frailty assessment tools on predicting postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing abdominal surgery

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics