天津护理 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 397-401.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9143.2026.04.004

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

耳鼻喉科护士应用前庭康复训练最佳证据的障碍因素的质性研究

万幸 官春燕 李菲 王淼   

  1. (华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院,湖北 武汉 430022)
  • 出版日期:2026-08-28 发布日期:2026-09-02
  • 基金资助:
    华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院“药技护”课题(2023XHYN068)

A qualitative study on barriers to the application of best evidence for vestibular rehabilitation training among otolaryngology nurses

WAN Xing, GUAN Chunyan, LI Fei, WANG Miao   

  1. (Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan Hubei 430022)
  • Online:2026-08-28 Published:2026-09-02

摘要: 目的:基于耳鼻喉科护士视角,对外周前庭功能低下患者应用前庭康复训练最佳证据的障碍因素进行分析,为临床制定相应对策提供参考依据。方法:基于 COM-B(Capability,Opportunity,Motivation,Behavior)模型制订访谈提纲,选择武汉市某三级甲等医院耳鼻喉科病房护士进行焦点小组半结构访谈,运用 Colaizzi 七步分析法对访谈资料进行转录、总结。结果:耳鼻喉科护士应用前庭康复训练最佳证据的障碍因素共提炼出 3 个主题(能力因素、动机因素、机会因素)及 6 个亚主题(护士前庭康复知识与技能掌握欠缺;护士对证据缺乏信任,循证护理能力低下;护士参与前庭康复实践信心不足,自我效能感差;护士缺乏自主决策能力,职业认同感欠佳;医护沟通欠佳,多学科合作机制不完善;系统层面支持不足)。结论:耳鼻喉科护士对外周前庭功能低下患者应用前庭康复训练最佳证据的障碍因素存在多样性,建议根据以上障碍因素,积极采取相关干预措施,推进前庭康复训练的最佳证据在临床中的应用。

关键词: 外周前庭功能低下, 前庭康复, COM-B 模型, 质性研究, 护士

Abstract: Objective: To analyze the barriers to the application of best evidence for vestibular rehabilitation training in patients with peripheral vestibular hypofunction from the perspective of otolaryngology nurses, and to provide a reference for developing clinical countermeasures. Methods: A semi-structured interview guide was developed based on the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior) model. Otolaryngology ward nurses from a tertiary grade A hospital in Wuhan were selected to participate in focus group semi-structured interviews. The interview data were transcribed and summarized using Colaizzi's seven-step analysis method. Results: A total of 3 themes and 6 sub-themes regarding barriers to the application of best evidence for vestibular rehabilitation training among otolaryngology nurses were extracted, including capability factors (insufficient mastery of vestibular rehabilitation knowledge and skills, lack of trust in the evidence and low evidence-based nursing competence), motivation factors (low confidence in participating in vestibular rehabilitation practice and poor self-efficacy, lack of autonomous decision-making ability and poor professional identity), and opportunity factors (poor nurse-physician communication and imperfect multidisciplinary collaboration mechanisms, insufficient support at the systemic level). Conclusion: There are diverse barriers affecting the clinical application of best evidence for vestibular rehabilitation training in patients with peripheral vestibular hypofunction among otolaryngology nurses. It is recommended to actively implement targeted intervention measures based on the above barriers to promote the clinical translation of best evidence for vestibular rehabilitation.

Key words: Peripheral vestibular hypofunction, Vestibular rehabilitation, COM-B model, Qualitative study, Nurses