天津护理 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 276-282.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9143.2024.03.005

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

清醒患者俯卧位通气治疗真实体验的质性研究

汤奕洋 1 李传圣 2 朱永健 2 张振宇 2 史瑞 1   

  1. (1.青岛大学护理学院,山东 青岛 266071;2.烟台毓璜顶医院)
  • 出版日期:2024-06-28 发布日期:2024-06-28

A qualitative study the real experience of prone ventilation therapy in conscious patients

TANG Yiyang1 , LI Chuansheng2 , ZHU Yongjian2 , ZHANG Zhenyu2 , SHI Rui 1   

  1. (1.School of Nursing, Qing Dao University, Qingdao Shandong 266071; 2.Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital)
  • Online:2024-06-28 Published:2024-06-28

摘要: 目的:深入了解清醒患者俯卧位通气治疗的真实体验,为医护人员有针对性地制定干预措施提供理论依据。方法:采用目的抽样法,2023 年 1 月 28 日至 2 月 18 日对烟台市某三级甲等医院呼吸科接受俯卧位通气治疗的 15 例清醒患者进行半结构式访谈,运用 Colaizzi 7 步内容分析法对资料进行编码、分类和提炼主题。结果:清醒患者俯卧位通气治疗的真实体验可归纳为 5 个主题、13 个亚主题,分别为负荷过重(躯体负荷过重、心理负荷过重)、态度转变(质疑效果、获益感增强、坚定治疗信念)、支持不足(家庭支持、医源性支持、同伴支持)、期待治疗更加完善(期待完善治疗流程、期待系统化及规范化的专科指导)及认知不足(知识缺乏、角色认知偏差、对治疗结局盲目自信)。结论:应减轻清醒患者俯卧位通气治疗的相关压力负荷,采取相关措施促进态度转变,提升信心,从而提高俯卧位通气治疗效果。增强患者的认知水平,给予系统的社会支持,提高其俯卧位通气治疗的依从性。并完善相关实施流程,提高俯卧位通气治疗实施的安全程度,给予患者系统化、规范化的专科指导,以促进疾病康复。

关键词: 俯卧位通气, 清醒患者, 质性研究

Abstract: Objective: To gain an in-depth understanding of the real experiences of prone ventilation therapy in conscious patients, and to provide a theoretical basis for healthcare professionals to develop targeted interventions. Methods: Using a purposive sampling method, semi-structured interviews were conducted from January 28 to February 18, 2023 among 15 conscious patients receiving prone ventilation therapy in the respiratory department of a Class A tertiary hospital in Yantai, and the data were coded, classified and refined into themes using the Colaizzi 7-step content analysis method. Results: The real experiences of the 15 conscious patients treated with prone ventilation could be categorized into 5 themes and 13 sub-themes, they were overload(somatic overload and psychological overload), attitude change(questioning the effect, increased sense of benefit and strong belief in treatment), insufficient support (family support, medical support and peer support), expectation better treatment (expectation of improved treatment process, expectation of systematic and standardized specialist guidance) and insufficient cognition (lack of knowledge, role cognitive bias and blind confidence in treatment outcome). Conclusion: Conscious patients treated with prone ventilation should have their measures reducing related stress load, and relevant measures should be taken to promote attitude change and confidence, so as to improve the effect of prone ventilation treatment. Enhancing patients′ cognitive level and providing systematic social support to improve their compliance with prone ventilation therapy are needed. We also improve the implementation process to improve the safety of prone ventilation treatment and give patients systematic and standardized specialist guidance to promote disease recovery.

Key words: Prone ventilation, Conscious patient, Qualitative study