天津护理 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 689-696.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9143.2024.06.013

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

医务人员实施预立医疗照护计划体验的 Meta 整合

陈垚 邓安梦 焦莹莹   

  1. (中国人民解放军陆军军医大学第一附属医院,重庆 400038)
  • 出版日期:2024-12-28 发布日期:2024-12-16

Healthcare professionals′ experiences with implementing advance care#br# planning:a qualitative Meta-synthesis

CHEN Yao, DENG Anmeng, JIAO Yingying   

  1. First Affiliated Hospital,Army Medical University(Third Military Medical University), Chongqing 400038
  • Online:2024-12-28 Published:2024-12-16

摘要: 目的:整合医务人员参与预立医疗照护计划(Advance Care Planning,ACP)体验的质性研究,为 ACP 在临床开展提供依据。方法:运用 PICoS 模型构建研究问题和纳入、排除标准;计算机检索 PubMed、Ovid、Embase、Medline、Web of Science、中国学术期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、万方数据库(Wanfang)、维普数据库(VIP)、中国生物医学文献数据库(Sinomed),检索医务人员参与 ACP 体验的质性研究,检索时限为建库至 2023 年 9 月。采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所质性研究质量评价工具(2016)对文献进行方法学的质量评价,并运用汇集性 Meta 整合的方法对结果进行整合。结果:共纳入 16 篇文献,提取 148 个研究发现,并归纳成 12 个类别和3 个研究整合,分别为 ACP 实施困境、ACP 实施过程中受多种因素影响、ACP 的益处感知 结论:ACP 是一个复杂的过程,ACP 的发展受到多种因素的影响,建议在完善 ACP 社会支持体系、加强医务人员相关培训、提高患者及家属的准备度和支持程度、通过多学科合作建立决策支持系统等方面继续努力。

关键词: 预立医疗照护计划, 体验, 质性研究, Meta 整合

Abstract: Objective: To integrate qualitative research on healthcare professionals′ experiences with participating in advance care planning (ACP), and to provide evidence for the clinical implementation of ACP. Methods: The research questions,inclusion and exclusion criteria were constructed by PICoS model. Systematic searches were conducted in databases such as PubMed, Ovid, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and Sinomed, focusing on qualitative studies concerning healthcare professionals′ experiences with ACP. The retrieval time limit was from the establishment of the database to September 2023. The Joanna Briggs Institute′ s Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (2016) was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies, and Meta-aggregation was employed to synthesize the results. Results: A total of 16 articles were included, extracting 148 research findings, which were categorized into 12 categories and 3 main themes including challenges in the implementation of ACP, various factors influencing the implementation process of ACP, and perceptions of the benefits of ACP. Conclusion: ACP is a complex process influenced by various factors. It is recommended to continue efforts in improving the social support system for ACP, enhancing relevant training for healthcare professionals, increasing the preparedness and support levels of patients and their families, and establishing decision support systems through multidisciplinary collaboration.

Key words: Advance care planning, Experience, Qualitative study, Meta-synthesis

中图分类号: